1. Debate the benefits and potential for harm that websites such as those that explain how to build bombs and other types of weapons present. If a website instructs visitors on how to perform an illegal act, justify why you feel the site's creator(s) should or should not be held criminally liable if a visitor carries out those instructions.
2. Identify who, if anyone, is responsible for preventing potentially harmful information from being shared via the Web.
3. Explain if there is any Internet content that you believe a government has the right or obligation to censor. Justify your position. Describe where you believe the line should be drawn between freedom of speech and national or personal safety