Respuesta :
I agree with Josie, because it would be easier since the other three numbers are decimals. If you prefer fractions, then change the three decimals to mixed numbers.
5.2, 2.1 and 4.5 "terminate." They are rational numbers. On the other hand, 1/7 is a proper fraction, but its decimal equivalent does not terminate: 0.142857142....
It would be faster to approximate the answer by converting 1/7 to a decimal fraction and round off the final result to 1 decimal place.
Certainly we could rewrite the original expression 5.2 + 2.1(4.5 - 4 1/7 ) as
5 2/10 + (2 1/10)*(4 1/2 - 4 1/7), find the LCD, and then go through the indicated operations, to obtain an "exact" answer. But given that all of the original numbers are given to only 1 decimal place, it makes no sense to worrry about accuracy to 2, 3, 4 or more decimal places. I'm with Josie.
It would be faster to approximate the answer by converting 1/7 to a decimal fraction and round off the final result to 1 decimal place.
Certainly we could rewrite the original expression 5.2 + 2.1(4.5 - 4 1/7 ) as
5 2/10 + (2 1/10)*(4 1/2 - 4 1/7), find the LCD, and then go through the indicated operations, to obtain an "exact" answer. But given that all of the original numbers are given to only 1 decimal place, it makes no sense to worrry about accuracy to 2, 3, 4 or more decimal places. I'm with Josie.