The Supreme Court concluded that, because African Africans were not citizens when the Constitution was adopted, they could not be considered citizens in this case.
What type of fallacy does this piece of evidence represent?
ad populum
genetic fallacy
begging the claim
hasty generalization

Respuesta :

B.) Genetic Fallacy

The Supreme Court concluding that, because African Africans were not citizens when the Constitution was adopted, they could not be considered citizens is an example based on someone’s origin rather than current meaning or context.

Fallacy:


A fallacious argument is one that looks to be correct and appealing on the surface but is logically incorrect upon closer investigation.

Option B represents the type of fallacy represented by this piece of proof of information.

The reasons for the fallacy:

The Supreme Court's conclusion that African Africans could not be deemed citizens since they were not citizens when the Constitution was enacted is an example based on someone's origin rather than current meaning or context.

For more information about fallacy, refer below:

https://brainly.com/question/11191231