Sam posted a series of hateful comments on a social media site. The social media site banned Sam. Sam argues this is a violation of his First Amendment right to free speech and he should be allowed back on the social media site. Did the social media site violate Sam's constitutional right to free speech? Yes; the First Amendment clearly states speech is a protected right. Social media is a form of speech that cannot be limited. No; the First Amendment prevents the government from limiting Sam's speech. Private companies can decide what speech is acceptable on their social media site. Yes; the First Amendment protects Sam's right to speak freely on social media. This right cannot be limited by government or a company like a social media site. No; the First Amendment protects the right of the press to speak freely. Private citizens like Sam are not protected

Respuesta :

Answer:

Explanation:

The first amendment might protect his rights, but many cases have been fought which protect us from being the victims of hate either in speech or printed form.

I live in Canada, and what I have written certainly is true in Canada. You could search out Keegstra and Zundel. The United States is much harder to find, but it must be there. My computer's battery is dying and I really can't find much but just search the supreme court freedom speech.

Answer: A it is

Explanation: