Connor wrote the following argument for an advertisement:

Trained service dogs should be provided for all people in need. For people who don’t have the full use of their arms or legs, service dogs can open doors and elevators, pick up objects, and even exchange money for goods. For people with impaired hearing, service dogs can alert people to door knocks, smoke alarms, alarm clocks, and even the call of a name. For people whose vision is impaired, service dogs can help people navigate city streets safely. A trained service dog can bring safety and freedom to tens of thousands of individuals.

Which concluding statement restates the argument’s claim?

A.
Dogs can receive adequate training to provide services that help a variety of people.
B.
For people who have physical disabilities, service dogs make excellent companions.
C.
For people coping with the loss of mobility, hearing, or sight, service dogs provide security and independence.
D.
For dogs that enjoy the company of people, there is no more worthwhile activity than providing services to people in need.

Respuesta :

wriley

Answer:

C

Explanation:

For people coping with the loss of mobility, hearing, or sight, service dogs provide security and independence.

Statement C restates the argument’s claim.

Why is statement C the most appropriate?

  • Statement C suggests that owning service dogs can help disabled people feel more secure and independent.
  • This is quite essentially the idea that is conveyed by Connor in his argument.
  • He provides examples of people with various disabilities can use service dogs to their advantage.
  • For example- Connor suggests that service dogs can help with mobility and access for people with limited mobility. He also mentions how people with impaired hearing and impaired vision may use service dogs to live a safer life.

Thus, statement C summarises all the ideas that Connor mentions in his argument and is the most appropriate choice.

Learn more about summarising here-

https://brainly.com/question/24858866

#SPJ2