You want to estimate the proportion of kids between the ages of 12 and 15 who have tried marijuana. You take a random sample of 130 Maryland students and find that 23% of the sample report having tried marijuana. Last year, the federal government ran a much larger survey of 10,000 students and found that 29% reported ever using marijuana. Test the null hypothesis that the true population proportion of Maryland students who have smoked marijuana is 29% versus the alternative hypothesis that it is different than that. Use a 3% significance level. Interpret your result.

Respuesta :

Answer with explanation:

Let p represents the population proportion.

By considering the given information, we have

[tex]H_0: p=0.29\\\\H_a: p\neq0.29[/tex]

∵ the alternative hypothesis is two tailed , so the test is two-tailed test.

Given : For sample size :n= 130,  [tex]\hat{p}=0.23[/tex]

Test statistic: [tex]z=\dfrac{\hat{p}-p}{\sqrt{\dfrac{p(1-p)}{n}}}[/tex]

[tex]z=\dfrac{0.23-0.29}{\sqrt{\dfrac{0.29(1-0.29)}{130}}}\\\\=-1.50762993902\approx-1.51[/tex]

P-value (two -tailed test)=[tex]2P(z>|-1.51|)=0.1310434\approx 0.131[/tex]

Since , the p-value (0.131) is greater than the significance level (0.03), so we accept the null hypothesis.

Thus , we conclude that we have sufficient evidence to support the null hypothesis  that the true population proportion of Maryland students who have smoked marijuana is 29% .