Respuesta :

Answer:

He meant by the statement that the decision of the court would change how the law regarding abortion in the first trimester is exercised and make its use more confusing.

Explanation:

  • After the court brought the law of abortion under the premise of the fundamental constitutional right to privacy or liberty, Justice Rehnquist questioned the broadness and the significance of the law and asked whether it is really that important to restrict the state from indulging into the matters of abortion in the first trimester of the pregnancy.
  • He believed that the decision given by the court in the matter would make the use of the law more troublesome.
Martebi

Justice Rehnquist said the decision left the abortion area of the law more confused than it found it as it tells that the law is not favorable or does not holds points.

What was his decision about?

Justice Rehnquist  stated that the decision left the abortion area of the law more confused than it found it and so implies that the court decision would change only on how the law in terms of abortion is exercised and thus makes it to be very confusing.

Therefore, we can say that Justice Rehnquist said the decision left the abortion area of the law more confused than it found it as it tells that the law is not favorable or does not holds points.

Learn more about decision from

https://brainly.com/question/27004710

#SPJ5

Otras preguntas