*******PSYCHOLOGY EDGE******Frank and Clint are the negotiators for two nations in conflict. Although the nations have been peaceful so far, their negotiations are not going well. During the negotiations, Frank gets very agitated at Clint. He begins to accuse Clint of not negotiating in good faith and asks Clint for a much larger concession than he previously had. Clint is outraged and threatens violent retaliation unless the demand is withdrawn.
Which of the following consequences of conflict escalation appears to have affected Clint?
A.
When the conflict escalated, Clint failed to use effective communication.
B.
When the conflict escalated, Clint included more parties in the conflict.
C.
When the conflict escalated, Clint generalized the conflict.
D.
When the conflict escalated, Clint failed to discount extreme opinions

Respuesta :

The correct answer is A; When the conflict escalated, Clint failed to use effective communication.

Further Explanation:

When Frank initially agitated with Clint and accuses him of not negotiating fairly, Clint gets really upset and uses threats. Instead of getting so upset, Clint should of used effective communication and made a calmer argument for his negotiation.

When you use effective communication you learn to understand peoples emotions and their real intentions. Some of the barriers of having effective communication are;

  • Lack of focus
  • Stress or out of control emotions
  • Negative body language
  • Inconsistent body language

Learn more about effective communication at https://brainly.com/question/1423564

#LearnwithBrainly

Answer:

A

Explanation:

got it right on edge