Respuesta :
Answer:
The answer is: Chief Joseph believed that Native American tribes had a right to sovereignty, while Commissioner Parker believed that Native American tribes were not sovereign nations.
Explanation:
Chief Joseph was the leader of an indigenous group of people called "Wal-lam-wat-kain," a Native American tribe.
Commissioner Ely S. Parker was a lieutenant of the American Civil War. He became the Commissioner of Indian Affairs which meant that he was responsible for managing the lands that was entrusted by the USA to the Indian tribes, Alaska Natives and American Indians.
The difference between Chief Joseph's and Commissioner Parker's arguments was that the Chief believed that Native American tribes had a right to sovereignty, while Commissioner Parker believed that Native American tribes were not sovereign nations.
For Parker, none of the tribes could guarantee them of a governance whereby people would obey the law. For him, it was a great deal of harm that the government of the USA allowed the Indians to believe that they were sovereign or independent nation. Because of this, Chief Joseph resisted the Americans when they negotiated with them to relocate to a reservation.
Chief Joseph claimed that Native American tribes had a right to sovereignty, but Commissioner Parker believed that Native American tribes were not sovereign states, which is really the correct answer.
The following was the distinction between Chief Joseph's and Commissioner Parker's arguments:
- None of the tribes could govern in such a way that people would obey the law if they were governed by the parker.
- The notion that the US administration encouraged Indians to believe in sovereignty or an independent nation caused a tremendous lot of harm.
- When the Americans spoke with Chief Joseph, he offered them to relocate to a reservation.
To know more about the difference between the arguments made by Chief Joseph and Commissioner Parker, refer to the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/2300664