How is this opinion different from the Supreme Court's ruling in Tinker v. Des
Moines?
O
A. The Hazelwood ruling distinguished between adults and children's
freedoms, while Tinker did not.
O
B. The Hazelwood ruling limited students' free speech rights, while
Tinker expanded them.
©
C. The Hazelwood ruling dealt with freedom of speech, while Tinker
dealt with religious freedom.
D. The Hazelwood ruling was based on the due process clause, while
Tinker was not
PREVIOUS

Respuesta :

Baraq

The opinion is different from the Supreme Court's ruling in Tinker v. Des Moines because the Hazelwood ruling limited students' free speech rights, while Tinker expanded them.

What was the cases like?

In a majority, the Supreme Court's majority ruled that neither students nor teachers “shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate.” The Court took the position that school officials could not prohibit only on the suspicion that the speech might disrupt the learning.

Therefore, the correct answer is option A Court's ruling in Tinker v. Des Moines because the Hazelwood ruling limited students' free speech rights, while Tinker expanded them.

learn more about freedom of speech: https://brainly.com/question/243946

#SPJ1