Answer: your question is incomplete, please let me assume, this to be your complete question;
ORIGINAL SOURCE:
helpful to think in terms of two basic kinds of change: piecemeal and systemic. Piecemeal change leaves the structure of a system unchanged. It often involves finding better ways to meet the same needs, such as using an analogy to help your students learn the science concepts you taught in an otherwise similar manner last year. In contrast, systemic change entails modifying the structure of a system, usually in response to new needs.
References:
Reigeluth, C. M. (1999). What is instructional-design theory and how is it changing? Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. 2, pp. 5-29). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
STUDENT VERSION
Reiguleth (1999) mentions two different kinds of change: Piecemeal and Systemic change. Systemic change entails modifying the structure of a system, in order to meet new needs. In contrast, piecemeal change leaves the structure of a system unchanged. For example, new innovations instead of traditional methods could be used to engage students in learning.
From the two papers work, is the student work;
Word to word plagiarism.
Paragraph plagiarism
Not plagiarism.
ANSWER: THE STUDENT WORK IS NOT PLAGIARISM.
Step-by-step explanation: Plagiarism is the use of someone paper work without acknowledging the person either in your citation or reference.
The student and the original source has consulted the same book for their paper work, this made their work to look similar. The similarities of their works is in the key words, which are the definitions, because they have consulted the same book for their paperwork, the definitions are likely to be the same. The student has chosen his own words to explain the content of what he got from the book he cited, which is not similar to the words the original source used .
