In her speech on chewing tobacco, Catherine made the following argument:_______
To be effective, laws governing chewing tobacco sales to minors must be enforced and must have adequate penalties for people who violate the law. My proposal will significantly increase both enforcement provisions and penalties for violators. Therefore, my plan will be effective.
What kind of reasoning did Catherine use?
a. reasoning from principle
b. reasoning from analogy
c. reasoning from specific instances
d. reasoning from expediency
e. reasoning from need

Respuesta :

Answer:a. reasoning from principle

Explanation:Catherine is drawing her reasoning from a principle which legally guides the sale of tobbaco to minors , so she moves from this general principle into making specific conclusion. She pays attention to this general principle and make statements to support that how reasoning from principle works .