Answer:
I enjoy Latin and the Study of Rome through the 2nd Century A.D. Caius Iulius Cæsar was a brilliant tactician and a Great Roman. I understand why he “had to go”, but Rome would have likely been better off with him than to allow his assassination. He broke TWO important rules one was simply Not allowed to break; he crossed the Rubicon, entering Rome with his armies, or much of it all; that was not allowed; Sulla, in 79-80B.C. Did the same and was punished “severely”, losing everything. Sulla was afraid of Cæsar even when he was still a boy! He was a threat.
The SECOND thing that just wasn’t done, was to be declared DIVI, or to be “Divine, a Living God”. That Was likely worse than Coming armed into Rome, at least according to the people of Rome.
Explanation: