How do the inherently suspect and reasonable standards​ differ? A. The inherently suspect standard evaluates whether a law is rationally connected to a legitimate government​ goal; the reasonableness standard evaluates whether a law is the least restrictive way to achieve that goal. B. The inherently suspect standard is a higher threshold for determining whether a law is constitutional. C. Under the inherently suspect​ standard, a law is presumed to be​ valid; under the reasonableness​ standard, a law is presumed to be invalid. D. The inherently suspect standard relies on​ observation; the reasonableness standard relies on data.