The following passage is an excerpt from Desert Solitaire, published in 1968 by American writer Edward Abbey, a former ranger in what is now Arches National Park in Utah. In the book, Abbey opposes the forces of modern development, arguing for the importance of preserving a portion of the southwestern United States landscape as wilderness. Read the passage carefully. Then, write an essay that analyzes the rhetorical choices Abbey makes to develop a particular vision of how human beings might coexist with the natural world.

There is a great relationship between human and nature. Human cannot live without nature. Nature provides water for drinking, food and other necessity of life. If we save nature we stop species extinction because there are millions of species present in the natural ecosystem. If we disturb the nature by burning of fossil fuels and cutting of trees, many species lost their habitat and the whole ecosystem is disturbed. So far maintaining balance in the nature, the human must take some serious steps such as protect water bodies from harmful substances and grow more trees etc.

jayilych4real jayilych4real · Answer 2 · 2022-01-24T13:41:28+01:00

The best analysis of the rhetorical choices and message passed across by the author is:

Humans and nature can exist together if the humans treat nature with care because nature preserves man.

Based on the complete text, there is the narration by the author about the relationship between humans and nature and the ways to maximise this relationship so both parties can benefit.

With this in mind, the author cautions against over use by the humans on the natural resources and nature in general.

Read more about human and nature here:

https://brainly.com/question/24533070