Which statement best describes Janelle's conclusion?
Her conclusion is incorrect because 2x + 10 is not
equal to 3x – 5.
O Her conclusion is incorrect because the angles are
not marked; therefore, no conclusion can be drawn.
O Her conclusion is correct because the value of x is
15.
O Her conclusion is correct because
m_LKM + m_LKJ = m_MKJ.

Question

contestada

Respuesta :

alucas911 alucas911 · Answer 1 · 2020-09-15T19:11:17+02:00

Answer:

C

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer Link

abidemiokin abidemiokin · Answer 2 · 2022-05-04T12:27:10+02:00

A bisected angles is divded equally. We can conclude that her conclusion is correct because the value of x is 15.

A bisected angles is divded equally. From the given diagram;

<MKJ = 80 degrees

According to Janelle, he conclude that KL is an angles bisector, if this is true then;

<MKJ = <LKJ

2x + 10 =3x -5

2x -3x = -5 -10
-x =-15
x = 15

Since <MKJ = 80

2x + 10

2(15) + 10

30 + 10

40

Hence we can conclude that her conclusion is correct because the value of x is 15.

Learn more on angle bisection here:https://brainly.com/question/25770607

#SPJ5