Respuesta :
Answer:
Rainsford killing General Zaroff was justified because he did it for self defense. At the time, Rainsford would not have known if Zaroff would've kept his promise of letting him go, so to be on the safe side. Some people may say that it was not justified and he could have just left since he won the game. However, if he did not kill Zaroff, many other men would be victim to his dangerous game. Zaroff had already killed many people and he would be dangerous if he was kept alive. Rainsford not only acted in self defense for himself but also for others. Therefore he was justified in killing Zaroff.
this is pretty much what the other person commented but they didn't seem to want points for it. soooo yeah. um this is a pretty good answer btw. good luck
Explanation:
The inference shows that Rainsford killing Zaroff was justifies because he did it for self-defense.
What is an inference?
It should be noted that an inference simply means the conclusion that can be deduced based on the information given.
In this case, Rainsford killing Zaroff was justifies because he did it for self-defense as he did not know if Zaroff would keep his promise of letting him go and therefore had to kill him.
Learn more about inference on:
https://brainly.com/question/25280941
