Respuesta :

Vankka

Answer: No. Manolo forgot to include that the opposite of squaring a number is square rooting. If you take the square root of 36, you get 6. When you square a number, you multiply it by itself, which is what Manolo did. He multiplied 6 by itself and got the answer of 36.

Step-by-step explanation: Hope this helps!

The Manolos reasoning is not complete because the quadratic equation has two roots and the roots are 6 and -6.

What is a quadratic equation?

Any equation of the form [tex]\rm ax^2+bx+c=0[/tex]  where x is variable and a, b, and c are any real numbers where a ≠ 0 is called a quadratic equation.

As we know, the formula for the roots of the quadratic equation is given by:

[tex]\rm x = \dfrac{-b \pm\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}[/tex]

The question is incomplete.

The complete question is in the picture, please refer to the attached picture.

It is given that:

A quadratic equation:

g² = 36

Manolo says that the solution of the equation g squared equals 36 is g = 6 because 6×6 = 36

As we know, the quadratic equation has two roots.

To solve the quadratic equation we can use the identity:

a² - b² = (a + b)(a - b)

g² = 36

g² - 36 = 0

g² - 6² = 0

(g + 6)(g - 6) = 0

g + 6 = 0 ⇒ g = -6

g - 6 = 0 ⇒ g = 6

Thus, the Manolos reasoning is not complete because the quadratic equation has two roots and the roots are 6 and -6.

Learn more about quadratic equations here:

brainly.com/question/2263981

#SPJ5

Ver imagen maheshpatelvVT