contestada

Does the author succeed in supporting the claim that "In no other department is a thorough knowledge of history so important as in philosophy"?

Yes, because he gives examples of why knowledge of history is vital to philosophy.

2.
Yes, because he proves that other departments of thought are not reliant on historical knowledge.

3.
No, because he proceeds to explain why knowledge of history is as important to other disciplines.

4.
No, because he digresses into another topic and does not address historical knowledge.

Respuesta :

ellecheeseman

Answer:

2

Explanation:

jayilych4real

The question about whether the author succeeds in supporting the claim that "In no other department is a thorough knowledge of history so important as in philosophy" is:

  • B.  Yes, because he proves that other departments of thought are not reliant on historical knowledge.

According to the given question, we are asked to show whether the author succeeds in supporting the claim that "In no other department is a thorough knowledge of history so important as in philosophy"

As a result of this, we can see that based on the complete text, the author succeeds in supporting his claim with evidence because it proves that the  other departments of thought are not reliant on historical knowledge.

Therefore, the correct answer is option B

Read more here:

https://brainly.com/question/14652623

Otras preguntas