Respuesta :
Here is the answer of the given question above.
Often times, non-human life in an urban ecosystem is more disturbed in a way that changes happen rapidly, such as the soil and plant cover and temperature and water availability. In this kind of ecosystem, there is no stability and sustainability. On the other hand, in an undeveloped forest ecosystem, plants play a major role and that, the lives in this kind of ecosystem is undisturbed, making it more ideal for many animals to live. Hope this answer helps.
Often times, non-human life in an urban ecosystem is more disturbed in a way that changes happen rapidly, such as the soil and plant cover and temperature and water availability. In this kind of ecosystem, there is no stability and sustainability. On the other hand, in an undeveloped forest ecosystem, plants play a major role and that, the lives in this kind of ecosystem is undisturbed, making it more ideal for many animals to live. Hope this answer helps.
This is what I wrote for mine:
In an urban ecosystem, the only non-human life that live there are the ones that are able to survive under the conditions. Because there is an awful amount of pollution in urban ecosystems, trees are the main plants there, and they are planted and grown along the sides of streets. Animals that are able to live in polluted areas like these are mice, squirrels, birds, and coyotes. However, in undeveloped forest ecosystems, there's barely any pollution. Therefore, a bigger variety of non-human life is able to live here. Plants like mosses, bushes, shrubs, and grasses grow here. These plants receive more nutrients than those of the urban ecosystem, simply because of how much less pollution there is.
I based mine off the Online Content link that was given, which provided information that directly answered the question.
Hope this helped and gave you inspiration for your answer! :)