Respuesta :
Answer:
E) concede that a poorly conceived project can still provide a benefit to those involved
Explanation:
The author primarily contrasts the gaudiness of the “abode” with the tastefulness of another house nearby in order to advance her line of reasoning about the difficulty of making “improvements” to a rural setting. However, the author concludes by considering a new piece of evidence, the relationship between the project and its workers. In light of this new evidence, the author shifts her line of reasoning: instead of demonstrating that the project was an aesthetic failure, she explains that even though the results of the abode’s “improvements” were ugly, the project nevertheless provided employment and training for the workers involved. By pointing out the project’s benefits to the community, the author softens her criticisms of its aesthetic failures.
The concede which is a poorly conceived project can still be provided with a benefit to those involved. Hence the option E is correct.
What does the author discuss?
The author mainly focuses on the gaudiness of the abode and the tastefulness of another house and advances his line to the rural settings.
He concludes by considering the new piece of evidence that is the relationship between the project and its workers. She tells us that even though the results of the abode’s improvements are ugly, the project nevertheless provided employment and training to workers.
Find out more information about the paragraph.
brainly.com/question/26123730