The proposition is not logical since it does not prove causation, since the two events may be just coincidental or the cause and effect may be inverted.
The problem with the proposition we are analyzing here is that it assumes there is causation, but it cannot prove that causation to be true. The two premises - the rooster crowing and then the sun rising - do not lead to the conclusion - the rooster causes the sun to rise.
Therefore, the proposition is not logical. The two events could simply be coincidental. Maybe the rooster likes to crow at the time when the sun rises. Or, better yet, maybe the cause and the effect have been inverted, in which case the rooster crows because the sun is about to rise.
Learn more about logical propositions here:
https://brainly.com/question/1757601
#SPJ1
