Respuesta :
Answer:
Speaker A differs from B because of one reason, which is this story: money
"A" has a good point by thinking that if you have enough money to buy a house on the spot, you shouldn't need to gain Social Security. But heres one thing "A" doesn't think about: what if said person runs out of money. The point of Social Security is to give money to the people that paid their taxes and if your retired. If your retired, you don't have a job, which means the only money you would be getting back is Social Security. Now, this starts to make it sound like im siding with "B" yes I am. However, I think to even this out, lower the amount of Social Security you get so both "A" and "B" get an even share of their opinions.
(hope my mindset was in the right place for this question)
Speakers A and B differ on the point of whether Social Security is a liability or it is justifiable, hence the option B is correct option.
Social Security
Social Security is the income provided by the Government to retired, unemployed and disabled workers. These benefits are essential for their financial needs.
Speaker A suggest that Social security is a liability on Governement as it drains out money, the solution A provides is to stop providing benefits to retirees with high income.
Speaker B on the other hand suggest that Social security is the right of workers, as they have paid for this welfare in their whole working years. So even if the benefits is going to high income retirees, social security should not stop because it is their own money.
Therefore, the correct option is B which says "Speaker A fears Social Security will soon not have enough money to pay anyone; Speaker B feels retirees are entitled to benefits they have paid for."
Learn more about Social Security here:
https://brainly.com/question/25226643