Hi. You did not submit the testimonies to which this question refers, which makes it impossible for it to be answered. However, I will try to help you as best I can.
The only way you can answer this question is by reading the two testimonies. The positive points of each testimony will be the arguments that were strongly explained and made you understand the position of each author. These arguments must be very well justified, with the presence of evidence that shows you how the argument is true and must be believed. These arguments will be strengthened and will become more positive if you present examples, statistics, references and other elements that justify them. On the other hand, the weaknesses of the testimonies will be the unjustified sentences, which do not have strong evidence and do not convince the reader about their veracity. Furthermore, these sentences may be poorly explained and poorly developed, failing to convince the reader of the author's position.
The positive places of every testimony will be the contentions that were unequivocally made sense of and caused you to get the place of each creator. These contentions should be very much supported, with the presence of proof that shows you how the contention is valid and should be accepted.
Whenever you give testimony you are determining what you saw for sure you know. Your testimony that your hand was not in the treat container conflicts with the testimony of a few observers.
The Latin root for testimony is testis, meaning witness.Observer testimony is an expression you will hear frequently in lawful conversations.
For more information about testimony, refer the following link:
https://brainly.com/question/26651069
