Which of the following explains how a hypothesis that is NOT supported by the results of an experiment can still be valuable?

Question 9 options:

A hypothesis that is not supported by the results of an experiment shows that the experiment was a waste of time.


None of the above


A hypothesis that is not supported by the results of an experiment always leads to the development of a new scientific theory.


A hypothesis that is not supported by the results of an experiment may lead to further research and investigations.

Respuesta :

Answer: hypothesis that is not supported by the results of an experiment may lead to further research and investigations.

Lanuel

The option which explains how a hypothesis that is NOT supported by the results of an experiment can still be valuable is: D. A hypothesis that is not supported by the results of an experiment may lead to further research and investigations.

An experiment refers to an investigation that typically involves the process of manipulating an independent variable known as the cause, in order to determine or measure the dependent variable known as the effect.

A hypothesis is simply tentative or an educated guess and it can be defined as a testable explanation for an experiment, observation or a scientific problem. Thus, any hypothesis that is not supported by observations and the results of an experiment is generally rejected in science.

However, this hypothesis not supported by the results of an experiment may be harnessed and subsequently, may lead to further research and investigations.

Read more: https://brainly.com/question/17542127