contestada

To test a new drug that has the potential of curing people of the common
cold a company asked human volunteers who were coughing and sneezing
to participate in a clinical study. The objective of the experiment was to test
whether the new drug could cure the volunteers in the experimental group of
the common cold. But instead of two groups, these volunteers were randomly
divided into three groups and treated as follows:
Group
Experimental
Group
Yes
Control
Group 1
NO
Control
Group 2
No
New ONS
Orange
Bedre
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Which of the following is the best explanation of why a second control group
was included in this experiment?
O A To prove that the common cold cannot be cured
B. To provide the volunteers in the study with something to drink
O C. To help researchers conclude that results are related to the new
drug and not to the orange juice
O D. To confuse anyone who is trying to steal their new drug and sell it
as their own invention

Respuesta :

Answer: C

Explanation: A good experiment does everything it can to eliminate confounding, or the influence of external sources on the data being measured. Orange juice could be a factor that plays a role in curing the symptoms, so provide a group with and without orange juice gives you the ability to show that the influence of orange juices didn’t have an effect on the cold, or did, but it gives you a baseline to show the effects of the medicine with and without orange juices.