AM28
contestada

With initial consent for a warrantless search, police spent three days searching a
suspect's home for various items (stolen money, illegal weapons, drugs). Which law
or U.S. Supreme Court ruling did they violate?

Mincey v. Arizona

Daubert v. Merrell Dow

Pharmaceuticals

Michigan v. Tyler

Kumho Tire Co. Ltd. v. Carmichael

Respuesta :

Michigan v. Tyler was the Supreme court ruling that they violated when

warrantless search was done.

Michigan v. Tyler case

The Court of Appeals of the State of Michigan affirmed the conviction for the

exception of a warrantless search only in the case of an arson.

In this case, there was no arson involved which is against the rule of law as

various items (stolen money, illegal weapons, drugs) were only searched for.

This thereby violates the U.S. Supreme Court ruling between Michigan v.

Tyler.

Read more about Michigan v. Tyler case here https://brainly.com/question/1622038