According to the information in the fragment, it can be inferred that the situation describes a case of secondary boycott.
A boycott is a term that refers to a joint action to oppose a company radically suspending the purchase of its products.
Specifically, the secondary boycott is based on the public's refusal to buy anything from someone who sells products made by the company being boycotted.
From the foregoing, it can be inferred that the secondary boycott is towards stores that continue to offer Realfruit Corp. products.
Learn more about boycott in: https://brainly.com/question/878223
#SPJ1