100 POINTS AND BRAINLIEST
The gaseous vapor which the Germans used against the French divisions near Ypres last Thursday, contrary to the rules of The Hague Convention, introduces a new element into warfare. The attack of last Thursday evening was preceded by the rising of a cloud of vapor, greenish gray and iridescent. That vapor settled to the ground like a swamp mist and drifted toward the French trenches on a brisk wind. Its effect on the French was a violent nausea and faintness, followed by an utter collapse. It is believed that the Germans, who charged in behind the vapor, met no resistance at all, the French at their front being virtually paralyzed.
—“Germans Use Blinding Gas to Aid Poison Fumes,”
New York Tribune (27 April 1915)

This account of the gas attack at Ypres emphasized that chemical warfare
a.
was used by the Allies.
c.
was not that harmful.
b.
was against international law.
d.
was not very effective.

The account of the gas attack in the passage at Ypres emphasized that chemical warfare was against international law. Option B is correct.

What is international law?

The body of laws, standards, and measures or norms that are generally accepted as obligatory between nations is known as international law, sometimes it is also known as the law of nations, public international law and international ethics.

International law is also defined as a body of written agreement and statements between countries that regularises how they handle with other countries, their occupants, and their business organizations.

The description of the Ypres gas attack made clear that chemical warfare was illegal under international law, as it was contrary to the rules of The Hague Convention.

Therefore, option B is correct.

Learn more about the international law, refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/18597093

#SPJ5