The fact that intelligent design is largely a religious belief and not a scientific principle, according to more than 90% of the scientists, is the main justification for why it shouldn't be taught in science classes in public schools
Should public schools cover intelligent design curriculum?
Intelligent design (ID) was developed in the 1990s, primarily in the United States, as an explicit denial of Charles Darwin's theory of biological evolution. ID is a pseudoscientific justification for the existence of God that its proponents present as "an evidence-based scientific theory about life's origins."
The idea that life on earth is so sophisticated that it cannot be explained by the scientific theory of evolution and must have been created by a supernatural being is the foundation of the pseudoscientific idea of intelligent design (ID).
Therefore, the fact that intelligent design is largely a religious belief and not a scientific principle, according to more than 90% of the scientists, is the main justification for why it shouldn't be taught in science classes in public schools
Learn more about intelligent design on:
https://brainly.com/question/6805392
#SPJ1
