Respuesta :
Although very well thought out and comprehensive Marx's. Marx's three sets of intelligence questions were considerably different from the Israeli intelligence model for ethics.
In that they are based on a well-thought-out strategy rather than heart and passion, the three sets of intelligence questions are in some ways the exact antithesis of the Israeli paradigm.
The three sets of questions Marx offers are utterly rational and founded on an ethical framework that does not appear to damage anybody without first satisfying a number of requirements, in contrast to the Israeli model, which appears to base all actions on maintaining tradition and family values.
Numerous Israeli ideals include techniques and tactics that balance the scales and create When someone says, "Thou must not stay inert while thy buddy bleeds," no one who has been injured is doubtlessly ashamed in certain respects.
However, Marx asks, "Personal relationships: Is the approach used in a personal or professional setting? suggests that even if it may be personal, one should proceed with caution and restraint to protect their life and continue the intelligence task. These kinds of situations are what separate the two theories and show how different they are from one another.
Overall, both ideas are sound, but they are very different, and depending on the circumstance, either approach might provide a variety of results.
Learn more about Marx
brainly.com/question/1002566
#SPJ4