Respuesta :
Personal biases impede the critical thinking of social scientists. The findings drawn are false and skewed.
What may happen if a social scientist's emotions or prejudices showed up in their study, both positively and negatively?
The results of the experiments show that social scientists are more likely to perceive phenomena positively when they are feeling happy or surprised than when they are feeling angry or other negative emotions. For instance, a researcher may think of youngsters as extremely effective and autonomous if they observe a group of kids playing together when they are by themselves. However, when they are upset, they could accuse their parents of abandoning their small children. As a result, since the results are tainted by the specific emotions the social scientist is experiencing, the validity of their research is called into doubt.
A researcher may unintentionally regard participants from that group more favorably when comparing the results of two groups in a particular area if they have a bias toward that group. In comparison to another group that a researcher believes to be less effective, they may be more enthusiastic when explaining the research to them. As a result, the group that receives special attention from the researcher throughout the process is more likely to perform better—not because they are genuinely more efficient, but rather because of it. Personal prejudices impair social scientists' ability to reason. The conclusions reached are skewed and deceptive.
Learn more about prejudices: https://brainly.com/question/12675783
#SPJ4
