Answer:
Explanation:
Numerous writers have utilized this technique, naming the characters by their profession only. This is accomplished for a couple of reasons, the fundamental being to outline the absence of singularity of those characters, who have lost every last bit of it and turned out to be just the picture that their profession ventures.
Answer:
I would say that the fact that in Hard Times by Charles Dickens the government official is not given a name in the selection shows that he lacks importance. The correct answer is the third one.
Explanation:
Everything the author decides to do or not to do is an artistic decision. In this case, if one of the characters is not named, it is probably because the author thought that it wasn't important enough to be named. Probably, the character's name is not important for the author because he wants to highlight his profession and not his name. Maybe, the character isn't that important to be individualized and is even a character that appears only once in the story and is not worth it for the readers to know his name. Sometimes, we can individualize a character for the activity he develops, that is, in fact, the one thing that is related to the story, and not by his name, that is information that sometimes the reader doesn't need to know.
