In Gideon v. Wainwright, the Supreme Court overturned their previous ruling in Betts v. Brady that states were not required to provide counsel.What Constitutional amendment was interpreted in both of these cases?
a.Fourth AmendmentB.Fifth AmendmentC.Sixth AmendmentD.Eighth Amendmentit isn't B

The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution codifies rights related to criminal cases in federal courts. The Supreme Court has ruled that these rights are so fundamental and important that the Fourteenth Amendment protects them in state courts by the due process clause.

Answer Link

In Gideon v. Wainwright, the Supreme Court overturned their previous ruling in Betts v. Brady that states were not required to provide counsel.What Constitutional amendment was interpreted in both of these cases? a.Fourth AmendmentB.Fifth AmendmentC.Sixth AmendmentD.Eighth Amendmentit isn't B

Respuesta :

Otras preguntas

In Gideon v. Wainwright, the Supreme Court overturned their previous ruling in Betts v. Brady that states were not required to provide counsel.What Constitutional amendment was interpreted in both of these cases?
a.Fourth AmendmentB.Fifth AmendmentC.Sixth AmendmentD.Eighth Amendmentit isn't B