Answer:
The logical fallacy present in Amit's argument is a faulty analogy. Amit suggests that since engineers were able to create self-driving vacuums, it should have been easy for them to transfer the same technology to self-driving cars. However, this analogy is flawed because self-driving vacuums and self-driving cars are not equivalent in terms of complexity and the challenges they present. The technology and engineering required for self-driving vacuums are different from those needed for self-driving cars. Therefore, it is not valid to assume that the success in developing one automatically guarantees success in developing the other. This faulty analogy undermines the argument and leads to a miscalculation in predicting the timeline for self-driving cars
