In katz v united states the supreme court ruled that tapping a public phone without a warrant violated the?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85057/850571bf2f3a5b7f1de849ae8cb6bd323d439b7b" alt="In katz v united states the supreme court ruled that tapping a public phone without a warrant violated the class="
Depending on answers: A Freedom of assembly, B protection against unreasonable search and seizure, C Right to avoid self-incrimination, D Protection against double jeopardy. The Correct one would be B: Protection against unreasonable search and seizure. Apex
Answer:
implied right to privacy for those looking for this answer
Explanation: