contestada


Which statement best explains how the reader can determine that the narrator of this passage is unreliable?

TRUE!—nervous—very, very dreadfully nervous I had been and am; but why will you say that I am mad? The disease had sharpened my senses—not destroyed—not dulled them. Above all was the sense of hearing acute. I heard all things in the heaven and in the earth. I heard many things in hell. How, then, am I mad? Hearken! and observe how healthily—how calmly I can tell you the whole story.



A)The narrator is very calm as he begins to relate all of the events of the story.

B)The narrator worries that his dreadful nervousness has caused him to go mad.

C)The narrator says he is not mad, but he claims he can hear all the sounds on heaven and earth.

D)The narrator has sharpened senses that allow him to hear sounds that others cannot.

Respuesta :

C)The narrator says he is not mad, but he claims he can hear all the sounds on heaven and earth.

Brainliest pls! :)

Answer:

C)The narrator says he is not mad, but he claims he can hear all the sounds on heaven and earth.

Explanation:

An unreliable narrator is a narrator, whether in literature, film, or theater, whose credibility has been seriously compromised. In the case of the above excerpt, the narrator says that he is not crazy, but soon he says that he can hear all the sounds of the sky and earth (besides being very nervous) and this is not normal for a person who is not crazy, for this reason the narrator's credibility is compromised which makes him an unreliable narrator.