Which statement is true of a federal but not of a unitary system of government. d) Its central government delegates responsibilities to local governments to carry out a) Its local governments are extensions of the central government b) Its local governments cannot be abolished by the central government c) Its central government usually appoints the leaders of local governments Next

In a federation what usually happened is that several different states realized that they were stronger together, like the 13 colonies, that saw an opportunity that by uniting they could grew stronger and defend themselves from future invasions and attacks, but prior to their union they already had a government and local governments so they all keep their governments and local administration while creating a new government above all of them with global jurisdiction but not unlimited power, in a unitary system all obbey a single unit so they unit appoint and abolishes new local governmment that are actually just branches of the unitary government, like in United Kingdom where Ireland and Wales have their own government but have only the powers that the British parliment is willing to give them.

holesstanham holesstanham · Answer 2 · 2019-11-18T13:24:46+01:00

Answer:

b) Its local governments cannot be abolished by the central government.

Explanation:

Both federal and unitary systems of government have small, local governments that work in conjunction with the federal government. These local governments also carry out duties that the central government cannot adress. However, the relationship between these different levels of government is different in each system. In a federal system, local governments enjoy more independence than in a unitary one. Moreover, in a federal system, the local governments cannot be abolished by the central government.