How did Chief Justice Earl Warren justify the need for a unanimous vote in Brown v. Board of Education?

A) It would show that the Supreme Court knew the schools were truly unequal.

B) It was the best way to address all Jim Crow laws with one ruling.

C) It would force states in the South to integrate their schools more quickly.

D) It was necessary to prevent a legal argument against integration.

Thank you

Question

12-04-2018
Social Studies

contestada

How did Chief Justice Earl Warren justify the need for a unanimous vote in Brown v. Board of Education?

A) It would show that the Supreme Court knew the schools were truly unequal.

B) It was the best way to address all Jim Crow laws with one ruling.

C) It would force states in the South to integrate their schools more quickly.

D) It was necessary to prevent a legal argument against integration.

Thank you

Respuesta :

Otras preguntas

William Faulkner and John Steinbeck’s fiction expressed a loathing of war. a deep patriotism. a search for meaning. a regional revival.

Suppose a friend is having difficulty solving -2(q-5) > -3(q+1). Explain how to solve the inequality, showing all the necessary steps and identifying the pro

how do facts in a memoir differ from facts in other types of non fiction

what does the separation of powers ensure?

How to solve the system of equations using elimination for 2x+3y=6 and x+2y=5

What could now be openly expressed among the residents of Salem?

Four more than a number is 12 x + 12 = 4 x + 4 = 12 x - 4 = 12 + x x - 4 = 12x

Refer to Explorations in Literature for a complete version of this story. How does the first-person point of view affect “The Pit and the Pendulum”? It enables

____ was the nation's most influential african american abolitionist and published an antislavery newspaper called the north star.

Based on dramaturgy, what is the definition of social setting? a. the players involved in the production b. the sign-vehicle where action unfolds c. the audienc

ovsadenash ovsadenash · Answer 1 · 2018-04-12T22:13:13+02:00

ovsadenash ovsadenash

12-04-2018

The answer is D.

It was necessary to prevent a legal argument against integration.

Answer Link

andriansp andriansp · Answer 2 · 2018-07-14T18:24:51+02:00

andriansp andriansp

14-07-2018

I believe the answer is:D. It was necessary to prevent a legal argument against integration.

The brown vs the board of education was a really unique case since on this case a person from racial majority is discriminated against over the minority. The unanimous vote in the case shows that racial discrimination can go both ways and must be treated as the same.

Answer Link